Sustainability and health combined in a portfolio: First healthcare fund managed under consideration of ESG criteria
Investments in the 40 most attractive healthcare companies worldwide, regionally diversified and across sub sectors
The sustainability filter includes a "best-in-class" approach and the application of a strict exclusion process
Indexed performance (as at: 14.01.2025)
NAV: EUR 184.20 (13.01.2025)
Rolling performance (14.01.2025)
I2-EUR | Benchmark | |
13.01.2024 - 13.01.2025 | 6.14% | 7.24% |
13.01.2023 - 13.01.2024 | -4.83% | 5.82% |
13.01.2022 - 13.01.2023 | -1.63% | 6.07% |
13.01.2021 - 13.01.2022 | 8.46% | 18.00% |
Annualized performance (14.01.2025)
I2-EUR | Benchmark | |
1 year | 6.14% | 7.24% |
3 years | -0.21% | 6.05% |
5 years | 4.89% | 8.32% |
Since Inception p.a. | 6.10% | 10.80% |
Cumulative performance (14.01.2025)
I2-EUR | Benchmark | |
1M | 1.02% | 2.18% |
YTD | 1.95% | 3.24% |
1 year | 6.14% | 7.24% |
3 years | -0.63% | 19.27% |
5 years | 26.99% | 49.13% |
Since Inception | 47.36% | 95.68% |
Annual performance
I2-EUR | Benchmark | |
2024 | 5.50% | 8.12% |
2023 | -4.62% | 0.45% |
2022 | -8.41% | 0.55% |
2021 | 15.38% | 28.63% |
Facts & Key figures
Investment Focus
The fund’s aim is to achieve capital growth in the long term, is actively managed and invests in healthcare firms with strong sustainability credentials and innovative business models. Examples of sustainability in the healthcare industry are environmentally sound procurement policies for drug makers, Show moreShow less
Investment suitability & Risk
Low risk
High risk
General Information
Investment Manager | Bellevue Asset Management AG |
Custodian | CACEIS BANK, LUXEMBOURG BRANCH |
Fund Administrator | CACEIS BANK, LUXEMBOURG BRANCH |
Auditor | PriceWaterhouseCoopers |
Launch date | 29.06.2018 |
Year end closing | 30. Jun |
NAV Calculation | Daily "Forward Pricing" |
Cut of time | 15:00 CET |
Management Fee | 0.80% |
Subscription Fee (max.) | 5.00% |
ISIN number | LU1819586188 |
Valor number | 41670706 |
Bloomberg | BBSHI2E LX |
WKN | A2JMRL |
Legal Information
Legal form | Luxembourg UCITS V SICAV |
SFDR category | Article 8 |
Redemption period | Daily |
Key data (31.12.2024, base currency USD)
Beta | 0.86 |
Volatility | 14.66 |
Tracking error | 9.92 |
Active share | 67.88 |
Correlation | 0.75 |
Sharpe ratio | -0.63 |
Information ratio | -0.58 |
Jensen's alpha | -6.34 |
No. of positions | 45 |
Portfolio
Top 10 positions
Market capitalization
Geographic breakdown
Breakdown by sector
Benefits & Risks
Benefits
- Investments in the 45 most attractive healthcare stocks worldwide with due account taken of current sustainability criteria.
- Many years of recognized bottom up expertise coupled with comprehensive sustainability research from Sustainalytics.
- The sustainability filter combines a best-in-class approach with the application of a strict exclusion procedure.
- Proprietary investement process: Half-yearly company evaluation and rebalancing.
- Underweighting of pharma and US stocks against the relevant healthcare indices, and a strong focus on mid caps.
Risks
- The fund actively invests in equities. Equities are subject to strong price fluctuations and so are also exposed to the risk of price losses.
- The fund may invest a proportion of its assets in financial instruments that might under certain circumstances have a relatively low level of liquidity, which can in turn affect the fund’s liquidity.
- The fund invests in foreign currencies, which means a corresponding degree of currency risk against the reference currency.
- Investing in emerging markets entails the additional risk of political and social instability.
- The fund may engage in derivatives transactions. The increased opportunities gained come with an increased risk of losses.
Review / Outlook
As in prior months, there was a large dispersion of performance across MSCI sectors. Consumer discretionary (+2.3%) and communication services (+2.2%) performed best, with materials (-8.2%) and real estate (-7.9%) the weakest. Despite the large underperformance versus global equities, the healthcare sector (-6.1%) performed broadly in line with the median across MSCI sectors (-5.9%).
Within the MSCI World healthcare index, there was also a considerable dispersion of monthly performance between subsectors. Life science tools (-2.6%) was the best performing subsector in the month, followed by medtech (-4.3%), biotech (-4.8%), and pharmaceuticals (-5.1%).
Healthcare services (-13.7%) performed very weakly driven by multiple negative political comments and plans around PBM pharmacies and other business models. From a geographical point of view, asia healthcare (-2.9%) performed best, with its companies perhaps further removed from the US market than US or European peers. European (-6.2%) and US (-6.3%) healthcare performed poorly.
During the month there were several key clinical trial related binary events in the sector. In particular, we note disappointing Phase III data in obesity for Novo Nordisk with Cagrisema, mixed Phase II data in chronic pain for Vertex pharmaceuticals, but positive Phase II data for Teva Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) with an TL1a inhibitor.
Within the fund, strong absolute performances were reported during the month from Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (ADR; +11.7%; broker upgrade), Sinopharm (+5.1%; local Chinese player disassociated with US healthcare reform concerns), and SOBI (+3.7%; broker upgrade). On the other hand, negative absolute performances were seen for Novo Nordisk (-19.2%; Cagrisema data disappointment), The Cigna Group (-17.9%; US political comments), and Akeso (-16.8%; pullback after strong September to November).
In order to get into the fund portfolio, the companies must meet the following criteria: Appropriate ESG risk profile (best-in-class approach), not involved in severe ESG-relevant controversies and comply with the ten principles of the UN Global Compact. In the case of controversial business areas and practices, revenue thresholds are defined for inclusion. The results of the ESG filter application demonstrate that around 40-50% of the titles meet our strict sustainability requirements. The proven factor analysis is then carried out according to four quantitative and four qualitative parameters. The objective here is to select companies that are inexpensive, have strong growth and have an exceptional competitive position so that they can maintain their leading position also in the future.
The analysis results in a portfolio structure consisting of the 40 most sustainable stocks in the healthcare industry, ten of them per region (Western Europe, North America, Japan / Oceania, emerging markets). The application of the eight factors in the past has typically led to a focus on mid cap stocks and an underweight position in pharma and the North America region relative to the MSCI World Healthcare Index. The rebalancing takes place every six months.
Documents
Show moreShow less
ESG
Portfolio examples with ESG relevance
Österreichisches Umweltzeichen